Sony’s first 16-55 mm (24-82.5 mm in 35mm equivalent focal length) APS-C zoom with a constant F2.8 aperture is remarkably compact while offering performance befitting the G Lens series. A new optical design delivers excellent corner-to-corner resolution, and beautiful bokeh is available when needed. It is compact, lightweight, and ideal for a wide range of subjects.

*When mounted on Alpha series cameras with APS-C type sensor, the actual angle of view will be equal to the angle obtained at a focal-length approx. 1.5 times longer than stated. The all sample photos in this movie are taken by APS-C bodies.

#SonyAlpha #SonyLens
Subscribe:

About Sony:
At Sony, our mission is to be a company that inspires and fulfills your curiosity. Our unlimited passion for technology, content and services, and relentless pursuit of innovation, drives us to deliver ground-breaking new excitement and entertainment in ways that only Sony can, creating unique new cultures and experiences. Everything we do is to move you emotionally.

Connect with Sony’s Digital Imaging Online.
Visit the Sony’s Digital Imaging WEBSITE:

source: https://thefirstworldwar.net/

Xem thêm các bài viết về Công Nghệ: https://thefirstworldwar.net/category/cong-nghe/

37 thoughts on “Product Feature | E 16-55mm F2.8 G | Sony | Lens

  1. I just got one for use on my a6500 and returned it. The vignette at 16mm is huge – complete with black corners in RAW. The jpegs have black corners too. Also, there is no Lightroom lens profile yet. So to correct for it you have to crop. I am very disappointed!

  2. No stabilisation… £1200? Shove it up your ass sony, you can pull it back out when it's £600.

    Regret not going fuji now, better 26mp sony sensors and cheaper lenses, the only reason aps-c isn't dead in the water is sigma. Sony seems intent on selling 4 year old sensors with the worst rolling shutter on the market and extortionate lenses in 2019, and it's making the platform looking increasingly shit.

  3. Sony! Give the 18-105mm f4 G finally a new dynamic design or a firmware update when it comes to sharpness and less distortion! It's a great lens already and had deserved more as a G series lens to be honest.

    Long live the G-Series!

  4. I thought it’s gonna be full frame lens

    It would be so perfect to have

    Sony 16-55 f2 full gram

    With that same weight, sharpness & quality

    Perfect for all the small and big Gimbal’s

    Get this on full frame 🙏🏻😞

  5. Way too expensive! I do miss the 24mm Wideangle, but can have the Fujifilm X-T30 with the excellent 18-55/2.8-4 XF "Kitlens", and still have plenty of money left, vs the A6100 and Sony G 16-55/2.8 Lens! Both together are State of the Art, the X-T30 uses the great 26 MP X-T3 Sensor, and together with the XF 18-55 both are "just" <1200 EUR, whileas the Sony 16-55/2.8 G is alone without an cheaper A6100 Series (and mediocre EVF, btw) alone is 1300 EUR ! lol.

  6. I would have payed $1400 for this if it had OSS inside. With that crappy a6600 IBIS this lens is so useless for video. You definitely need a gimbal. You should be totally mental to buy this combo and sleep well at night with Sony A7III + tamron 28-75 f2.8 in mind.

  7. Wow! How fast! Less than 9 years!
    8 years sony users beg this.
    Next 8 years sony users will beg 2.8 aps-c zoom before 1400$

  8. I don’t know why anyone still use aps c sensor camera as it’s nearly the same price than first full frame camera. And lens are not much cheaper. Go full frame.

  9. In all honesty, f/2.8 still isn’t even very fast. Would rather just shoot with faster primes, or a slow zoom lens with stabilization

  10. For those whom complain1400USD for an APSC lens, you probably haven't heard of Fujifilm's 16-55mm F2.8, I guess. That is, if you compared it by MSRP.

  11. Us: "Sony isn't serious about APS-C" …complains…
    Sony: "Here's the fast standard zoom that you guys always wanted!"
    Us: "Its $1500, no thanks I'm going full frame instead" … complains continues…

  12. The one lens every body wants, but few got to own
    cause of the freaking price of cours
    I'm waiting for the Sigma version now

  13. The $1400 price is ridiculous. Even Sony 24-105/4 is under $1200 (Canon was selling their spectacular RF 24-105/4 for $900) and that lens is far better in every respect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *